BBC’s New Comedy Cash Injection: Because Who Needs to Save Money Anyway?
In an exclusive revelation that has us all laughing—hopefully with them, not at them—the BBC has decided to sprinkle an extra £10 million ($12 million) onto its comedy budget over the next two years. Because if there’s one thing we all know, it’s that comedy isn’t about being funny; it’s about how much cash you can pump into it, right? Director Jon Petrie is clearly feeling quite chipper about U.S. collaborations and the upcoming season of Jack Whitehall’s Bad Education, a sparkling jewel in the crown of British humor—or at least that’s what they tell us.
This financial boon is apparently directed towards “high-impact material that represents the whole of the UK.” Which translates to: Let’s throw money at a bunch of shows and hope at least one of them makes us chuckle. Petrie referred to the funding as a “sizeable increase,” but let’s be honest, anything less than a ‘sum that could have funded a small country’ probably wouldn’t make the headlines.
“I feel very lucky that we have it,” he said, probably while pretending he didn’t hear the radio static from the other end of the line where someone was asking him about the meaning of life in the world of sensible budgeting. This charming exchange took place right before he dashed off to Newcastle for the BBC’s first Comedy Festival—a spectacle that promises to be more about mingling than mirth, with big names like Romesh Ranganathan and Charlie Brooker joining the festivities. Is it comedy? Or just a glamorous way to define ‘networking’?
While we ponder the deeper meanings of comedy and economic prudence, it’s worth noting that this windfall comes at a time when the BBC is preparing for more than just punchlines. No, they’re planning an extravagant lineup featuring the magical world of Detectorists, along with series reboots of The Cleaner, Jerk, and Guilt—because tired jokes and long-lost friends are a winning combination, apparently.
Of course, Petrie insists this additional funding will help manage the “rising costs” of producing such “high-impact” content. You know, like postal expenses when sending out rejection letters to everyone who didn’t make the cut. “High-impact” seems to be the new buzzword, much like “pivot” in the startup world, used whenever something doesn’t actually make sense but sounds cool.
As the BBC throws this money around, you can’t help but wonder whether they’ll finally crack the code to comedy gold or if they’ll channel their inner Robin Hood—only this time, they’re robbing from the budget to pay for more of what might make us laugh, even if just politely in public.
In conclusion, as you watch the bountiful comedies rolling out of the BBC over the next two years, just remember: it’s not about how much money they spend. It’s how many awkward moments—like this article—make us laugh, however haplessly. Cheers to that!
